Answer: Someone who says one thing and means a mother.
May 6, 2006 was the 150th anniversary of the birth of Sigismund Schlomo Freud. At the age of 21, he shortened Sigismund to Sigmund and more or less ditched the Schlomo. As Sigmund Freud, he left a huge shadow of complexities over our modern world. His legacy is immense, not least his complexes. His theories are loved and despised in equal measure. And he smoked lots of cigars.
Though few people actually read Freud these days, we pepper everyday speech with his legacy. We talk of Freudian slips, the Oedipus Complex and anal retentiveness. If the question and answer that introduced this article appeared in a list of Freud jokes, it would have been an anal, oedipal, slip. The mother of all jokes about the father of psychoanalysis and the man who, among many other things, wrote a book called Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. So who was Freud, why do we remember him with such controversy, and why would a father of psychoanalysis write a book about jokes?
To answer these question, we must first seek the help of history. Freud was born into a Jewish family in 1856 in Moravia. His native city is what was then Freiburg in the Austrian Empire and is now Příbor in the Czech Republic. Two things there, Moravia is still Moravia and Freud is Czech. His father Jakob was a successful wool merchant who had two children from an earlier marriage. At 40 years of age, Jakob married Amalie Nathanson. Sigi was the first and favourite of their eight children. Young Sigi’s bright, precocious nature was obvious from an early age and he excelled at school. He was a smart kid. At the age of eight, he was reading Shakespeare, and spoke several languages. His boyhood hero was Hannibal, who marched his elephants across the Alps. When his father asked him why Hannibal, the young boy replied “because he was a Semitic leader who fought the Romans.” From an early age Freud was acutely aware of his Jewishness in a predominantly Roman Catholic country.
At medical school he fell under the influence of Theodore Meynert, the leading brain anatomist of the day. Meynert convinced Freud to specialise in neuropathology, the study of diseases of the nervous system. There he had easy access to medicine, and he fell under the influence of something else: cocaine. He saw cocaine as an anti-depressant and an anaesthetic. He himself took cocaine in small doses for about two years. He prescribed it to a friend as an antidote to his morphine addiction. He also assisted on an eye operation to his own father using cocaine as a local anaesthetic. This was ground-breaking work. However he was beaten to the credit by Carl Koller who claimed discovery of anaesthetic cocaine for himself. That this was a true blessing in disguise for Freud became apparent in 1886. Cocaine quickly lost its wonder drug status when its addiction properties were widely reported. In the same year, Freud received a grant to go to Paris and study with Jean Martin Charcot, a world famous neurologist. Charcot was also a brilliant teacher and he held court at Paris's Salpêtrière Hospital. Here he showed Freud the similarities between hypnotism and hysteria. Hysteria, the Latin for womb, was then seen as a "women’s ailment" which caused paralysis and convulsions in its victims. When he got back to Vienna, Freud noticed he could treat patients of both sexes who were showing these symptoms. A speech for his paper on ‘male hysteria’ caused hysteria of its own at the Vienna Medical Society. He was shouted down.
Undeterred by the medical outrage, Freud began to use hypnotism to treat his patients. He worked closely with his friend Josef Breuer who also used this technique. One day, Breuer mentioned a patient of his, a young lady known as “Anna O”. Anna showed symptoms of paralysis and hallucinations which Breuer treated by discussing the hallucinations. Because she felt better when discussing the problem, she called it the "talking cure." Breuer cured Anna completely by hypnotising her and thus teasing out the root cause under hypnosis. Freud was impressed by what Breuer called his cathartic method and began to use it himself. Freud made a few adjustments to the method. He found hypnotism didn’t work especially well for him. But one thing worked very well indeed. Patients talked a lot easier when placed on a couch. When they were relaxed, he allowed them to talk through their own cures by a mixture of free association and lack of censorship. He coined a name for this technique: psychoanalysis.
Here was another Freud theory not well received by the medical profession. The only person willing to listen to Freud was Wilhelm Fleiss. Fleiss was a Berlin nose-and-throat specialist with some radical ideas of his own. He believed that sexual illnesses were caused by disturbances in the nose. He operated twice on Freud for nasal infections. Nasal problems were not Freud’s only headaches. His father’s wool business had completely collapsed and he died broken and broke in 1896. Freud was now supporting the entire family as well as six children of his own. Nonetheless, he still found time that year to write his first book The Interpretation of Dreams. Freud proved to be a gifted writer and he cleverly exposed dream meaning with highly intriguing interpretations of nocturnal adventures.
Freud theorised that the mind had two parts. There was the preconscious containing ideas and memories. And then there was the unconscious with desires, impulses and wishes of a mostly sexual and sometimes destructive nature. In 1905 he published more horror on an unsuspecting public, his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. He said that the basic sex drive, the libido, was formed at birth. Children went through three sexual stages, the oral (breastfeeding), the anal (toilet training) and the phallic stage (the discovery of the sex organs at aged five or six.) The phallic stage applied to males and females. Young boys suffered castration fantasies at the hands of their fathers whereas girls suffered penis envy when they realised they were already “castrated”. This phallic stage was where the Oedipus Complex was acted out. Children’s sexuality then went into latency before reawakening at puberty. Freud stated that this two-stage sexuality was uniquely human.
This was certainly a theory to turn heads. Society was outraged. He was accused of destroying childhood innocence and of turning everything into a tawdry matter of sexuality. As a blow to human pride, it ranked with Copernicus’s theory of the solar system and Darwin’s theory of evolution. Here was Freud saying that mind does not equal consciousness; instead, what is mental is mostly unconscious and involuntary. His radical views picked up some influential adherents. By the end of the first decade of the new century, Freud was internationally famous. The Vienna Psychoanalytical Society was born under Freud’s aegis. It included the luminaries of the field such as Otto Rank, Alfred Adler and Carl Jung. Initially the young Swiss Jung was Freud’s greatest disciple. Freud admitted Jung was like a son to him. But relations soured when Jung started to diverge from some of Freud’s basic ideas. He went to America and announced that Freud was over-emphasising the sexual aspects of the theory. Freud didn’t have much time for dissent and further arguments led to an irrevocable split in 1912.
Around the same era, he proposed a new map of the mind in his book Beyond the Pleasure Principle. This was the id, the ego and the superego. The id holds the primary urges of the unconscious mind. The superego is the home of our conscience, taboos and morality. The ego tiptoes uneasily between the other two to give rise to self. This dynamic turned morality upside down. Sometimes it was our actions that form morality and not the other way round. Religion had no place in the Freud pantheon. Though always Jewish, he was first and foremost a scientist.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32d44/32d44ac01ef76a406ac5cbfd4d29c315467ad53f" alt=""
Freud was to prove as controversial in death as he was in life. The philosopher Karl Popper challenged Freud’s theories as pseudo-scientific. Popper argued that a scientific theory should be able to specify the empirical observations that would falsify it. Psychoanalysis cannot be tested empirically and therefore was not science. “Freud or Fraud” was a common catchcry as critics sought to poke holes through his theories. Feminists too were outraged by his castration and penis envy theories and said he was misogynistic. Today opinion is still deeply divided; some psychiatrists regard him as a charlatan, but many others agree with the core of his work.
Others again like A.C. Grayling, Professor of Philosophy at the University of London, see both sides. "Freud," says Grayling, “was a gifted artist, a philosophical visionary who re-imagined human nature and helped us confront taboos, but whose theories, offered as science, fail under scrutiny.” Freud’s contemporary and friend of letters Albert Einstein also recognised the genius and the failings. He said of Freud, “he had a sharp vision; no illusions lulled him to sleep except for an often exaggerated faith in his own ideas.”
As for Freud’s book on jokes, he theorized that jokes have only two purposes: aggression and exposure. Here was a man who said many things and meant much more than a mother.
5 comments:
Very interesting... It should be mentioned that Freud's family on both sides were not Moravian Jews at all, but came from Galicia, the most backward province of the Austrian Empire. My great great grandfather, Joseph Nathanson, was a cousin of Freud's mother Amalie Nathanson and like her came from Brody. Being related to Freud evokes mixed feelings in me since, aside from the more dubious aspects of psychoanalytic theory, his attitude towards Judaism was pretty negative, particularly in his last book, Moses and Monotheism. When the Nazis were attacking Judaism, why did Freud feel he had to join in? It certainly didn't earn him any special favours from them after the Anschluss.
Thanks for your comments, Paul.
My research had not led me in the direction of Galicia as an ancestral site of Freud's family.
Given that you directly share the family heritage, how do you feel about Freud's legacy to the 21st century?
Cheers,
Derek (Woolly Days)
Hi my name is sandi and i was wondering if you knew anything else about "the interpretation of dreams" i have a report due and your work that you post is great.
Besides Sigmund Freuds work is really intersting to me and you seem to know a lot more thatn me.
Sandeezy,
have you read the Wikipedia article on the Interpretation of Dreams?
It's a useful starting point and has a link to a free online copy of the book.
"When the Nazis were attacking Judaism, why did Freud feel he had to join in?"
I think it is a little simplistic to judge him from our historical position. I think it is hard for us to imagine the impossible atmosphere of being Jewish in a profoundly anti-semitic environment. It could be he made public antisemitic statements to seem so to survive. His family had to spend an enormous amount of money in order to get his family out of Austria, and his four sisters died in concentration camps.
Furthermore, I had the opposite reaction to Moses and Monotheism. It made me more interested in Judaism, and it increased my respect for it.
Post a Comment